Google Ups Ante with 1000 Patents from IBM

Google has acquired more than 1000 patents from IBM in rank to pad its portfolio. Patent judicial proceeding is a theater of the ludicrous in most cases, but it has evolved into a standard business practice among technical school companies, and Google needs more fodder to maintain itself.

Once upon a time, a patent had a role. Someone who creates a uncomparable process, or innovative product should be rewarded for his operating theatre her efforts, and that skill should be safeguarded from merely being copied or stolen by rivals.

Patent litigation — Evident violation suits are precisely standard business subroutine these days.

When information technology comes to patents today, though, is any of information technology really unequaled or innovative any longer? Tech patents seem to be preponderantly indistinct and over-reach. The intent is to be ambiguous enough in defining what precisely the patent is that you lavatory apply it to virtually anything in the event that you choose to instigate a patent offense lawsuit, or end up needing to champion yourself against extraordinary.

Google's cosmopolitan counsel, Kent Zimmer frame, recognizes that patent of invention litigation is ridiculous. Helium recently stated that the plague of patent infringement lawsuits is quelling innovation, and that companies are victimisation their patent portfolios to bully rivals and prevent products Beaver State services from competing.

Of course, Walker finished that argument by using it every bit a justification for wherefore Google has to get in happening the patent portfolio game. Google is a relative bran-new Thomas Kyd connected the block compared with its prima rivals, and it doesn't have the depth of patents necessary to adequately fight down itself from companies like Apple Oregon Microsoft.

US Patent Office — Information technology would be nice to fix the patent of invention system, merely that is easier same than done.

Florian Mueller, a technology patent and intellectual property psychoanalyst, common with me via netmail, "In my opinion the root get of the problem is that politicians believe larger numbers of patents granted aside a Patent and Trademark Office Database tally to more innovation. If the economy or even just the tech sector had grown at a rate anyplace most the rate at which the numbers of patent applications and grants increased complete the last 10 to 15 years, we'd be living in a period of unprecedented growth."

Mueller explains that it is a interlacing catch-22. The patent system of rules is broken to some extent, merely drafting a solution that terminate for some reason secernate between preferred or undesirable patents in a way that patent examiners, judges, or juries can easily understand and apply consistently is well-nigh impossible. He sums up with, "Any major change would inevitably come with wholesome collateral damage and screaming protest from those who see themselves affected by any such proposal."

So, we are left with this system of rules where the subject of the patent is almost less important than the come of patents. Information technology is a kind of nuclear arms race for computer software and technology companies. Atomic number 2 with the most patents wins.

Now, Google has 1000 more patents in its arsenal and it is that much more prepared for PatentGeddon.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/481485/google_ups_ante_with_1000_patents_from_ibm.html

Posted by: crossleyhustend.blogspot.com